| Managing Your IT Financials |
| On the road to better Fiscal Responsibility, you need to know your financials even better than the Finance folks do. Fluency in this area is a prerequisite to all other IT metrics that follow. |
|
| Budget vs. Actual: the starting point for all financial discussions, compares budget vs. actual spending each month. |
| Three Views: |
| Each of these views expose IT spending in a manner that is meaningful to different constituencies, allowing them to better understand where their money is being spent, and how they can rejigger priorities to get more value. |
| To map data between different views requires certain assumptions about how to distribute expenses for each service among the SBUs. |
| Expense Types: |
| The benefits of a chargeback model are (1) administrative simplicity, and (2) user incentive to control consumption. However, problems pop up when IT groups try to variablize more of their budgets than they should, especially the indirect and shared costs. |
|
| Because actual expenses have both fixed and variable components, its growth slope will not be as steep as that of a fully variable chargeback model:
At the end of the day, only the real expenses get paid, so obviously an over-recovery won’t cost the company any extra money. |
| Functional View Categories: |
| Service View Categories: |
| Variance: plots each month’s variance and cumulative variance, to give a running total of budget overruns or funds yet to be spent |
| Spending Ratios: allows for comparison of spending across divisional budgets that may vary in size |
| Rates and Units: decomposes spending into rates and units for tracking efforts to reduce unit costs and/or control unit growth |